| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Jezza McWaffle
Pandora Sphere
Disavowed.
128
   |
Posted - 2014.07.02 07:40:00 -
[1] - Quote
Increase the number of random spawning connections between people in the same constellation as you. I think this could be interesting as then actually choosing what constellation to live in matters and it could help any new people to wormholes in choosing a low inhabited area to live. For those of us already settled it could obviously bring more PvP but the chances of connecting to the same people again can provide some fun tactics, ie seed 3 dreads into someone system while rolling for their hole to find them, and suddenly during PvP, 3 more dreads!
C6 Wormhole blog
http://holelotofwaffle.wordpress.com/ |
Jezza McWaffle
Pandora Sphere
Disavowed.
128
|
Posted - 2014.07.02 07:43:00 -
[2] - Quote
Ahost Gceo wrote:Hatshepsut IV wrote:[quote=Bleedingthrough]Could we get fixed signature IDs?
Signature ID change after DT is a pain in the ass. You basically have to probe down your pipe twice if you want to be sure about connectivity. quote]
No. just no.
On another note, can we get the ability to split the probe scanner and d-scan from the same nested window?
How about you support why you would say no to that? Its an idea I think will not greatly change things for good or bad, and quite honestly I've found myself sighing in the morning while staring at the siggy list knowing I'll have to scan everything down again.
I can't actually figure out a reason why this idea sounds good  but give me 10 mins 
C6 Wormhole blog
http://holelotofwaffle.wordpress.com/ |
Jezza McWaffle
Pandora Sphere
Disavowed.
128
|
Posted - 2014.07.02 07:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
Hatshepsut IV wrote:Ahost Gceo wrote:Hatshepsut IV wrote:[quote=Bleedingthrough]Could we get fixed signature IDs?
Signature ID change after DT is a pain in the ass. You basically have to probe down your pipe twice if you want to be sure about connectivity. quote]
No. just no.
On another note, can we get the ability to split the probe scanner and d-scan from the same nested window?
How about you support why you would say no to that? Its an idea I think will not greatly change things for good or bad, and quite honestly I've found myself sighing in the morning while staring at the siggy list knowing I'll have to scan everything down again. Fine. Because seeing which sigs are new vs from downtime is a very usefull way to judge activity and sort likely WH canidates from systems with 20+ sigs. If you jump into a system 16 hours into a day with only two new sigs its a good bet that the new sigs are potentially k162s. It makes chasing down activity to shoot at easier. Like following breadcrumbs.
This wouldn't change that, hes advocating that sigs already their before DT remain the same ID's, so any new sig gets a new ID, like it is now.
C6 Wormhole blog
http://holelotofwaffle.wordpress.com/ |
| |
|